Defense of the Faith – Page 7 – A Thimble-full of Theology for Daily Living

John 1:1 and the Jehovah’s Witnesses – Episode 23, Jesus Is Priest Forever

Could John have intended that the Word was ‘a’ god? Wouldn’t it make sense

If we would understand how John intended us to understand John 1:1c, “and the Word

If we would understand how John intended us to understand John 1:1c, “and the Word

If we would understand how John intended us to understand John 1:1c, “and the Word

If we would understand how John intended us to understand John 1:1c, “and the Word

If we would understand how John intended us to understand John 1:1c, “and the Word

If we would understand how John intended us to understand John 1:1c, “and the Word

If we would understand how John intended us to understand John 1:1c, “and the Word

If we would understand how John intended us to understand John 1:1c, “and the Word

From John’s perspective, could he, would he, describe Jesus as ‘a’ god? Jehovah’s

"...and the Word was God." (John 1:1c) kai God,” or he meant it to be indefinite,

“...and the Word was God…” (John 1:1c) Kai theos ēn ho logos The Word, Jesus,

"...and the Word was with God..." (John 1:1b) John is telling us there is a plurality

"...and the Word was with God..." (John 1:1b) When we come to John 1:1b and read

"...and the Word was with God..." (John 1:1b) Can God be with God? John's assertion